Justice Maryann Anenih of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory on Tuesday, fixed July 17 for ruling on an application filed by the immediate past Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello seeking to travel out of the country on health grounds.
At the resumed hearing of the money laundering case filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission against the former governor, his counsel, Joseph Daudu, SAN, told the court that he had filed an application, dated 19th June, 2025, and filed on June 20, 2025. “It seeks an order for the release of the 1st defendant/applicant’s international passport by the Registrar of the court to enable him to travel for medical attention,” he said.
The counsel said the application was predicated on 13 grounds in the face of the motion paper and supported by 22 22-paragraph affidavit deposed to by Yahaya Bello himself. The EFCC Counsel had filed a counter-affidavit, saying that granting the request could delay further proceedings. Daudu, SAN, in response to the prosecution team’s counter-affidavit, said the Defendant’s team had also filed a further affidavit of 20 paragraphs, filed on July 7, 2025, and deposed to by the applicant himself with two exhibits.
Exhibit C is the Certified True Copy of the ruling of your lordship, admitting the defendant to bail, and Exhibit D is the ruling of the Federal High Court, also admitting him to bail.
“We adopt these documents in urging your lordship to grant our application,” he stated. Responding to the Prosecution’s argument that the application was an abuse of court process in the sense that a similar application was filed at the Federal High Court, Daudu argued that it could not be an abuse of court process.
He hinged his argument on the fact that it was the complainant who instituted the two separate charges in the separate courts. “It will be a futile exercise to apply in one court and not to apply in the other court,” Daudu, SAN submitted.
The prosecution counsel, Chukwudi Enebele, SAN, while defending the EFCC’s counter-affidavit, said Yahaya Bello should have put his sureties on notice concerning his application to travel out of the country. According to him, the sureties need to decide whether they would want to continue to stand as sureties for him when he travels.
He added that by filing the same application at both the FCT High Court and Federal High Court, the Defendant’s Counsel were setting the courts on a collision course. “If the Federal High Court refuses that application and my lord grants it, it will make a mockery of our Judicial system,” the EFCC lawyer argued. Responding, Daudu SAN said, on the issue of suretyship, the sureties were already aware. “We need not put them on notice,” he said.
“Finally, on the Interpol matter, Daudu said that the issue of Interpol likely to arrest the applicant is a dead argument, the applicant having submitted himself for trial. “He has never flouted your lordship’s order. They have even forgotten