Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, Nyesom Wike, has defended Edo State Governor, Monday Okpebholo, over his controversial comment urging former presidential candidate Peter Obi to notify him before visiting the state.

 

Speaking on Monday, July 22, during the commissioning of commercial buses in Benin City, Wike dismissed the backlash against Okpebholo’s statement, describing it as a reasonable and responsible security precaution.

 

“I’ve watched on TV the unnecessary debate. Nigerians forget easily,” Wike said.

 

 

 

Recalling his own time as Governor of Rivers State, Wike noted that Obi had followed protocol by informing him ahead of any visit, a gesture he said allowed for proper security coordination and logistical support.

 

“When Peter Obi was coming to my state, he notified me. I provided logistics and a vehicle for him to use,” he revealed.

 

 

 

Wike argued that as a high-profile political figure, Obi’s movements must be adequately monitored to prevent potential threats, adding that any harm that befalls a prominent visitor in a state could implicate the sitting governor.

 

“At that level, as a presidential candidate, if he does not tell you and anything happens, the governor will be held responsible.

People should stop politicking when the truth is being told,” he added.

 

 

 

He cautioned that Obi’s growing coalition and public engagements may expose him to risks, reinforcing the need for protocol and communication with state authorities.

 

“Obi, knowing fully well with his so-called coalition, anything can happen. They will accuse the governor of being behind it.

So the statement you made [Okpebholo], you are quite right,” Wike affirmed.

 

 

 

Wike’s support for Governor Okpebholo comes amid sustained criticism following the latter’s demand last week that Peter Obi must notify the Edo State Government before visiting. Critics had described the statement as politically driven and unnecessary.

 

However, Wike’s endorsement of the position adds weight to the argument that security and accountability concerns justify such a directive, especially in Nigeria’s politically charged environment.